CDC Was Withholding Data That Shows The Vaccines Don't Work

The Real Story Is The Changing Narrative

For over a year, the CDC in the United States has been collecting data on covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status and not making the data available to the public. The official response from the CDC is that the data was omitted over fears the data would be misinterpreted. 

We can assume then, that this data is not favourable to covid-19 vaccines.

This has all come to light via an article in the New York Times. Which is also available on Yahoo.

Also, four days earlier, Public Health Scotland stopped publishing data on covid-19 deaths and hospitalisations by vaccination status - over concerns the data would be “misrepresented by anti-vax campaigners”.

We can assume then, this data is also not favourable to covid-19 vaccines.

In the case of Scotland, an “official” from Public Health Scotland apparently told The Scotsman newspaper:

"What we are going to do is do a lot more on the vaccine effectiveness side and try and make people understand how effective the vaccine is.”

So, no bias then.

And who is the unnamed official?

This unnamed official also made strange associations with the American right-wing. It’s become so ridiculous and the more ridiculous the narrative becomes the more the people behind it expose themselves. And I may add, all the people who work in the media who are going along with it.

This is of course just the latest episode in an ongoing attempt to conceal the facts from the public about the safety and efficacy of covid-19 vaccines. These actions of censorship and concealment are criminal and have cost the lives and livelihoods of millions. We must not forget these criminal actions and we must follow through with all peaceful means available to make sure that all those people responsible are held accountable. 

Journalism used to involve trying to find the story behind the story and to that end I think it is important to ask some additional questions that have not been asked anywhere else . That is, why are we finding out about this now? This data has been concealed for a year. Up until now, the New York Times has been a key publisher of real misinformation during the pandemic.

Image included to depict our current situation. We must break free from the matrix of censorship and concealment of the facts. yumikrum, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

I have previously written about the Trusted News Initiative, which the New York Times is part of. A group consisting of the most powerful international media and social media, including Google, who conspired to agree not to publish anything detrimental to the covid-19 vaccines. So, why has the New York Times suddenly had a change of heart?

This coincides with recent comments from Bill Gates that the omicron variant has done a better job than the covid-19 vaccines. In this interview Gates says “sadly” the omicron variant is a type of vaccine. Each of us can decide for ourselves why he chose the word “sadly”. 

It seems that now the cat is completely out of the bag that the vaccines did not work and are not safe, there is a concerted effort to distribute to the public a plausible explanation how this happened. Various scapegoats will be offered up to the public. It appears that the CDC will be one of these, but in the end will simply claim that it needs more funding. The people behind the criminal attempt to use the pandemic to enrich themselves and enslave the rest of us must not get away with this.