Stargate Project: A Gateway to a Medical Dystopia
Construction of the healthcare digital control grid has already begun.
In early 2025, the Stargate Project was officially unveiled—a $500 billion collaboration between tech giants and the U.S. government to build AI infrastructure. With promises to transform industries like healthcare, the plan includes the construction of between ten and twenty massive data centers across the country.
The first site in Abilene, Texas, is already under construction and it was reported a few days ago that 16,000 Nvidia GB200 GPUs will be deployed there by the end of Summer 2025 and 64,000 by 2026. The Nvidia GB200 is a superchip designed for large scale AI learning.
It has been said that the Stargate Project will ensure United States' competitive edge in the global AI landscape but what exactly is the Stargate Project for and which aspects of our lives will be affected? Few people are talking about the dystopian future it could be creating.
One of the ways that Stargate is being sold to us is by suggesting it will result in a leap toward curing diseases like cancer.
“We will be amazed at how quickly we’re curing this cancer and that one,” said OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman, one of the main people behind the project.
Larry Ellison, the CEO of Oracle, said:
“One of the most exciting things using the tools that OpenAI and Softbank are providing is a [mRNA] cancer vaccine… you can do early cancer detection with a blood test…once we gene sequence that cancer or tumor, you can then vaccinate the person… design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.”
These comments are extremely troublesome.
Gradually, more and more people are realising that mRNA vaccines are very very bad. We have yet to calculate the full scale of the health crisis caused by the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and the number of deaths caused. We also now realise that these are not vaccines at all but are more accurately described as genetic treatments.
In addition, the Stargate Project's leadership lacks representation from the medical community. The initiative is spearheaded by tech executives without substantial input from healthcare professionals. This omission raises concerns about the project's alignment with actual medical needs and ethical considerations in healthcare.
In fact, there is no alignment between medical needs and the Stargate Project. Real deficiencies in cancer care stem from severely out-of-date guidelines that focus on chemotherapy and radiation - treatments that are carcinogenic in themselves. A lack of access to integrative oncologists, and an unwillingness to conduct basic research to confirm the efficacy of simple treatments. As well as many other areas that doctors have identified.
Misplaced Genetic Focus in Cancer
The project's emphasis on genetic approaches to cancer treatment aligns with a trend that many experts argue receives disproportionate attention. Most cancers, by far, are not genetic but influenced by environmental and lifestyle factors, suggesting that a holistic approach is more effective. Overemphasis on genetics will further divert resources from these broader, more impactful methodologies.
Stargate is not about health. It is about the further centralisation of money and power. This can easily be appreciated by considering the track record of the people involved.
Key Figures Behind the Initiative
Sam Altman: CEO of OpenAI, a leading AI research organisation.
Masayoshi Son: Founder and CEO of SoftBank, a multinational conglomerate with significant investments in technology and telecommunications.
Larry Ellison: Co-founder and CTO of Oracle Corporation, a major player in database software and cloud services.
President Donald Trump is also playing a pivotal role in endorsing and promoting the Stargate Project. However, it should be noted that a project on this scale must have been in the making for some time behind closed doors, and during the previous administration.
Most of the world is currently dazzled by the shock and awe of the Trump administration. I’m not a supporter of either the Trump or the Biden administrations, since they both have the same most terrible bad smell of authoritarianism.
Centralisation of Power and Control
The corporations involved in the Stargate Project have historically exhibited tendencies toward centralisation and market dominance:
OpenAI: Transitioned from a non-profit to a profit model, raising concerns about the integrity of the organisation, the consolidation of AI research, and its accessibility. Microsoft Corporation, a company famous for centralisation and monopoly building, is a major partner, shareholder and investor in OpenAI. The software is also not open source, in contrast to the organisation’s name.
SoftBank: Known for ramping up investments in AI companies, including a significant stake in the chip-making giant Arm. SoftBank has made extensive investments, leading to significant influence over various tech startups.
Oracle: As a dominant force in enterprise software, Oracle has faced scrutiny over its market practices and consolidation efforts.
These organisations are clearly motivated by the potential for massive increases in the centralisation of technological power through the Stargate Project.
There are many questions about how all of this technology will be used. Many of us suspect that it will be used in all sorts of ways against ordinary people and not to benefit us. The collaborations with government are also chilling and should alarm us all. Especially if you are aware of how these alliances worked against us during the COVID Wars.
Egalitarian Promises vs. Historical Actions
Proponents claim the Stargate Project will democratise healthcare by leveraging AI to make advanced treatments more accessible. However, the track records of the involved entities suggest a focus on profit and market dominance over egalitarian principles. Dystopian nightmares are always sold as a utopia at the beginning, until its too late to do anything about it.
The convergence of vast investments, centralisation of technological power, and misalignment with public health priorities raises the specter of a dystopian future. Without transparent governance the Stargate Project is likely to exacerbate inequalities, prioritise profit over well-being, and erode public trust in technological advancements.
Conclusion
The suggestion that Stargate is needed because of international competition for AI dominance does not currently hold-up. Firstly, I’m not aware of any other half-trillion dollar AI projects anywhere else in the world. But most importantly there is a core problem with the way AI is being developed.
I wrote in a previous post that AI should focus on human-centric design and should be designed to complement and enhance human relationships, rather than replace them.
Developers should prioritise features that encourage meaningful human connections and discourage overreliance on AI. Unfortunately, many of the systems being developed seem to be aimed at creating a digital prison, a mind prison through propaganda and censorship, and are anti-human.
Well said ! The more who see through and make different choices the more fragile it will become. Making the choice now is the key though.
Few people are intelligently having this conversation. The conversation has been propagandized, I think, so that the term 'innovation' would be deemed irrevocably a topic for fit only for tech, where few in the general public are being included in the discussion. I just learned of a sustainable construction innovation today that would eliminate formaldehyde for almost the entire structure of any kind of project while being fire and mold resistant. Where's the space for this discussion today?
Everytime a question is raised about E.M.'s activity in proximity to DC, for example, the reflex response is that Trump ran with overwhelming approval while making known his plans for Musk. This doesn't mean that The People approve of every E.M. business model, and yet we're looking at his vehicles grace the White House lawn.
There can't be an approval rating without discussion. Meanwhile, the general population has been served up a two-for-one deal. No one can say that the tech agenda isn't influencing what's going on currently in proximity to DC, something that Trump did NOT campaign on. Yet, we keep hearing about his approval rating in regard to the topic. It's a false duplicity. Tech could be great, but the public just hasn't been included in the discussions.
This has instead been reserved for big industry while it's influences are bombarding us. Kind of like the format in which ai advanced. It used data fed from user activity on every major platform, a two-for-one deal that hasn't been explicitly assessed. Why does ai get to source an incomprehensible amount of information without sourcing ? Who are the writer, authors, speakers, artists, photographers, researchers, architects, etc. we should be crediting for every response spat out? What human could present any credible research without providing the source and/or methods?
These are the kinds of discussions that tech hopes we overlook at their gain . Btw, there have been numerous medical cures kept from the public. We don't actually need ai for anything.