Few people are intelligently having this conversation. The conversation has been propagandized, I think, so that the term 'innovation' would be deemed irrevocably a topic for fit only for tech, where few in the general public are being included in the discussion. I just learned of a sustainable construction innovation today that would eliminate formaldehyde for almost the entire structure of any kind of project while being fire and mold resistant. Where's the space for this discussion today?
Everytime a question is raised about E.M.'s activity in proximity to DC, for example, the reflex response is that Trump ran with overwhelming approval while making known his plans for Musk. This doesn't mean that The People approve of every E.M. business model, and yet we're looking at his vehicles grace the White House lawn.
There can't be an approval rating without discussion. Meanwhile, the general population has been served up a two-for-one deal. No one can say that the tech agenda isn't influencing what's going on currently in proximity to DC, something that Trump did NOT campaign on. Yet, we keep hearing about his approval rating in regard to the topic. It's a false duplicity. Tech could be great, but the public just hasn't been included in the discussions.
This has instead been reserved for big industry while it's influences are bombarding us. Kind of like the format in which ai advanced. It used data fed from user activity on every major platform, a two-for-one deal that hasn't been explicitly assessed. Why does ai get to source an incomprehensible amount of information without sourcing ? Who are the writer, authors, speakers, artists, photographers, researchers, architects, etc. we should be crediting for every response spat out? What human could present any credible research without providing the source and/or methods?
These are the kinds of discussions that tech hopes we overlook at their gain . Btw, there have been numerous medical cures kept from the public. We don't actually need ai for anything.
This post was a genuine eye-opener for me. I had no idea that there was so much effort and money focused on trying to achieve a cure for cancer using artificial intelligence. It won’t work. These super intelligent characters are blinded by their own brilliance, and they have taken the wrong fork in the yellow brick road that leads to a blind alley and a dead end. There’s an old computer geek observation: GIGO (garbage in = garbage out). In other words, computers can’t produce useful information unless they are properly programmed with valid facts and principles. Think of the “HAL” computer in Kubrick’s 2001 movie. None of these megalomaniacs has the foggiest idea of what cancer it, or of the fatal flaws in the currently prevailing paradigm of medical research, which is called “The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology” (i.e.the “transcription/translation” mechanism). To appreciate this, you need to understand the recent history of medical research, which was dominated by “stress theory” for about 30 years after the DNA discovery. This was founded on the ideas of Dr. Hans Selye, who believed that an undiscovered “stress mechanism” converts the genetic blueprint into embryological development and then remains active for the remainder of life to repair tissues and regulate organs. Unrelenting combinations of environmental stresses that hyperactivate this stress mechanism would theoretically cause it to waste its substrates and produce excessive and defective versions of its products, and this would explain the nature of disease and compelling disease associations. For example, morbid obesity, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer are all closely-associated. Orthodox medical theory cannot explain this or much of anything else. Selye’s ideas inspired an intense international search for the hypothetical stress mechanism, which consumed the careers of hundreds of trained medical researchers, the lives of thousands of tortured test rats (no, not politicians and lawyers) and cost millions (today billions) of dollars but was abandoned after 30 years of fruitless and frustrating failure, whereupon Selye’s ideas were abandoned and relegated to the realm of the Unicorn. However, Selye’s ideas were never disproved and they have always remained the most promising prospect for an effective theory of medicine. Another 30 years of accumulating information from unrelated research was needed to discovery the elusive extracellular stress mechanism, which is now poised to reform and revolutionize medicine, except that Big Pharma now has its tentacles plunged deep into the bowels of medical research, publications, government regulators, and teaching, and they know full well that stress theory and the discovery of the stress mechanism threatens them with annihilation. www.stressmechanism.com
Thanks for this, Justin. I have to confess that I've allowed myself to get swept up in the shock and awe and have been ignoring this specter on the horizon. But here's a question re Larry Ellison's mRNA wet dream: so many of us now know so many vaxxed people who have died or are currently seriously ill with turbo-cancers, and increasing numbers of them are connecting the dots to the injection. Would they fall for this again? Where is the groundswell of resistance, if there is any?
I think there are a number of dynamics taking place. Some people are waking up, some have been beaten into submission, others cannot handle the truth. Overall it appears that many people have low resistance to propaganda.
These people adhere to reductionist thinking, attempting to use massive computational power to solve inherently incalculable complex problems. Their approach is not even as effective as mine: *The First Principles Approach: Reinventing Cancer Treatment*
The newly discovered stress mechanism mentioned above provides a fresh explanation of cancer and confers a radically different treatment strategy. Malignancy is a self-sustaining state of tissue repair which induces abnormal cell proliferation that continuously invades and disrupts adjacent tissues and releases tissue factor and von Willebrand Factor hormones into blood circulation and exaggerates thrombin generation. This is described in detail in my book called “50 Years Lost in Medical Advance: The Discovery of Hans Selye’s Stress Mechanism” More details at my website www.stressmechanism.com.
Well said ! The more who see through and make different choices the more fragile it will become. Making the choice now is the key though.
Totally agree.
Few people are intelligently having this conversation. The conversation has been propagandized, I think, so that the term 'innovation' would be deemed irrevocably a topic for fit only for tech, where few in the general public are being included in the discussion. I just learned of a sustainable construction innovation today that would eliminate formaldehyde for almost the entire structure of any kind of project while being fire and mold resistant. Where's the space for this discussion today?
Everytime a question is raised about E.M.'s activity in proximity to DC, for example, the reflex response is that Trump ran with overwhelming approval while making known his plans for Musk. This doesn't mean that The People approve of every E.M. business model, and yet we're looking at his vehicles grace the White House lawn.
There can't be an approval rating without discussion. Meanwhile, the general population has been served up a two-for-one deal. No one can say that the tech agenda isn't influencing what's going on currently in proximity to DC, something that Trump did NOT campaign on. Yet, we keep hearing about his approval rating in regard to the topic. It's a false duplicity. Tech could be great, but the public just hasn't been included in the discussions.
This has instead been reserved for big industry while it's influences are bombarding us. Kind of like the format in which ai advanced. It used data fed from user activity on every major platform, a two-for-one deal that hasn't been explicitly assessed. Why does ai get to source an incomprehensible amount of information without sourcing ? Who are the writer, authors, speakers, artists, photographers, researchers, architects, etc. we should be crediting for every response spat out? What human could present any credible research without providing the source and/or methods?
These are the kinds of discussions that tech hopes we overlook at their gain . Btw, there have been numerous medical cures kept from the public. We don't actually need ai for anything.
This post was a genuine eye-opener for me. I had no idea that there was so much effort and money focused on trying to achieve a cure for cancer using artificial intelligence. It won’t work. These super intelligent characters are blinded by their own brilliance, and they have taken the wrong fork in the yellow brick road that leads to a blind alley and a dead end. There’s an old computer geek observation: GIGO (garbage in = garbage out). In other words, computers can’t produce useful information unless they are properly programmed with valid facts and principles. Think of the “HAL” computer in Kubrick’s 2001 movie. None of these megalomaniacs has the foggiest idea of what cancer it, or of the fatal flaws in the currently prevailing paradigm of medical research, which is called “The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology” (i.e.the “transcription/translation” mechanism). To appreciate this, you need to understand the recent history of medical research, which was dominated by “stress theory” for about 30 years after the DNA discovery. This was founded on the ideas of Dr. Hans Selye, who believed that an undiscovered “stress mechanism” converts the genetic blueprint into embryological development and then remains active for the remainder of life to repair tissues and regulate organs. Unrelenting combinations of environmental stresses that hyperactivate this stress mechanism would theoretically cause it to waste its substrates and produce excessive and defective versions of its products, and this would explain the nature of disease and compelling disease associations. For example, morbid obesity, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer are all closely-associated. Orthodox medical theory cannot explain this or much of anything else. Selye’s ideas inspired an intense international search for the hypothetical stress mechanism, which consumed the careers of hundreds of trained medical researchers, the lives of thousands of tortured test rats (no, not politicians and lawyers) and cost millions (today billions) of dollars but was abandoned after 30 years of fruitless and frustrating failure, whereupon Selye’s ideas were abandoned and relegated to the realm of the Unicorn. However, Selye’s ideas were never disproved and they have always remained the most promising prospect for an effective theory of medicine. Another 30 years of accumulating information from unrelated research was needed to discovery the elusive extracellular stress mechanism, which is now poised to reform and revolutionize medicine, except that Big Pharma now has its tentacles plunged deep into the bowels of medical research, publications, government regulators, and teaching, and they know full well that stress theory and the discovery of the stress mechanism threatens them with annihilation. www.stressmechanism.com
Thank you, Dr. Coleman for your comment. I hope many more people will take a look at the work you are doing on the stress mechanism!
Thanks for this, Justin. I have to confess that I've allowed myself to get swept up in the shock and awe and have been ignoring this specter on the horizon. But here's a question re Larry Ellison's mRNA wet dream: so many of us now know so many vaxxed people who have died or are currently seriously ill with turbo-cancers, and increasing numbers of them are connecting the dots to the injection. Would they fall for this again? Where is the groundswell of resistance, if there is any?
I think there are a number of dynamics taking place. Some people are waking up, some have been beaten into submission, others cannot handle the truth. Overall it appears that many people have low resistance to propaganda.
These people adhere to reductionist thinking, attempting to use massive computational power to solve inherently incalculable complex problems. Their approach is not even as effective as mine: *The First Principles Approach: Reinventing Cancer Treatment*
https://clo2xuewuliu.substack.com/p/the-first-principles-approach-reinventing
The newly discovered stress mechanism mentioned above provides a fresh explanation of cancer and confers a radically different treatment strategy. Malignancy is a self-sustaining state of tissue repair which induces abnormal cell proliferation that continuously invades and disrupts adjacent tissues and releases tissue factor and von Willebrand Factor hormones into blood circulation and exaggerates thrombin generation. This is described in detail in my book called “50 Years Lost in Medical Advance: The Discovery of Hans Selye’s Stress Mechanism” More details at my website www.stressmechanism.com.